Share

Home ›› Court Opinions Topics & Themes   Asset Forfeitures   Conspiracy   Drug Policy Opinion   Drugs: Types, Dosages, Effects   First Amendment   Justiciability   Medicinal Marijuana   Policy Considerations   Proportionality   Reasonable Expectation of Privacy   Searches and Seizures      Airports      Borders      Consent      Drug Testing      Dwellings      Exclusionary Rule      Grounds for a Search      Informants      Mail      Nuances of Detention      Personal Items      Private Action      Roads and Vehicles      Tools and Augmentation      Warrants   Sentencing and Penalties Authors Trivia

Court Opinions ›› Hudson v. Michigan (2006) BOOKER T. HUDSON, JR., Petitioner v. MICHIGAN No. 04-1360 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 126 S. Ct. 2159; 165 L. Ed. 2d 56; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 4677; 74 U.S.L.W. 4311; 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 244 January 9, 2006, Argued June 15, 2006, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MICHIGAN. Detroit police executing a search warrant for narcotics and weapons entered petitioner Hudson's home in violation of the Fourth Amendment's "knock-and-announce" rule. The trial court granted Hudson's motion to suppress the evidence seized, but the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed on interlocutory appeal. Hudson was convicted of drug possession. Affirming, the State Court of Appeals rejected Hudson's renewed Fourth Amendment claim. Held: The judgment is affirmed. [The] violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule does not require suppression of evidence found in a search. Opinion by: SCALIA

Get Rich - and Quick! - hilarious and useful advice. How To Gamble Online In Us Hier können sie sicher Cialis bestellen - ohne Rezeptt! Drug War Facts - just what the website name says. Very informative. Drug Info - list of authority sites on various drugs. © 2007 Yakov Spektor Privacy Policy